Expert view: UAE mortgage cap to benefit long-term landlords, hurt tenants and flippers

The recent circular issued by the UAE Central Bank on capping mortgage lending came as a surprise to many people within and outside the financial world.

At a time when sale prices and rents have been on the increase, this new circular will have a significant impact on the real estate market, and depending on which side of the fence you are, this may be viewed as a good or a worrisome development.

To briefly recap the Central Bank’s new circular, mortgages have been capped at 70 per cent for the first house for nationals and 50 per cent for the first house for non-nationals; while stricter limits of 60 per cent and 40 per cent apply for subsequent houses for nationals and non-nationals, respectively.

While the guidelines came as a surprise, some of the major questions being raised are why did the authorities come out with these new mandates at this time, and why is it being implemented so suddenly, without much grace period?

The sudden nature of the mandate also means that market participants have been left wondering as to who will benefit from these new guidelines and will be the losers? Additionally, what options are there for all players involved in the real estate market, including UAE nationals and expatriates?

As to why, some people have been guessing that the UAE Government is trying to avoid a feral real estate market and heavy speculation as was the case in 2008, which ultimately led to a collapse in the market.

It seems that, at least potentially, the winners of the new circular will be landlords. The rental market is mainly expatriate-driven and this will have an inflationary impact on rents since most people will not be able to afford paying 50 per cent down payment.

This class, mostly salaried, will have to scrap any plans to buy units and instead continue renting, this is in addition to the probable psychological effect it will have, which will lead to further increases.

As to the losers, in addition to individuals who will probably have to pay higher rents, there will be many other affected parties including construction companies, banks and finance companies, and investors who bought properties to resell.

The circular will also have a negative effect on sale prices and may lead to reduction in mortgage lending, which will have a knock-on effect on the profits of lenders.

It is understandable that the UAE Central Bank, as well as companies and individuals in the UAE, would like some measures to avoid what happened in the past.

However, in our opinion, the circular seems to miss the mark as it may not accomplish its ultimate goal.

Increased rental rates could lead to individuals having to borrow from banks (personal loans) in order to be able to meet increased rental rates and demands from owners. This could lead to a shift from mortgages to personal loans – although this would not be a game changer since personal loans may be used to bridge the funding gap only.

Furthermore, certain institutions which specialise in mortgages will be affected by the new rules as they may see their business negatively impacted and, unlike banks, do not have any other banking product to offer.

The Central Bank should be applauded for taking pre-emptive measures to avoid any problems and inflationary pressures in the real estate market. However, this may be better accomplished through other means such as limits on mortgage amounts that are tied to an individual’s salary, credit worthiness of the borrower and improved due diligence.

As things stand right now, it seems that the circular will only bring down the prices while increasing rentals in the UAE, not to mention the negative effects it may have on mortgage companies and other financial institutions.

It remains to be seen if the new rules will be kept intact by the Central Bank or whether it will be revisited pursuant to the feedback received from various components of the UAE’s real estate market, most notably the lenders.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

About the authors: Ahmad Waheed is an Associate in the Banking & Finance Department, and Victor Siriani is Marketing Manager at Bin Shabib & Associates LLP, a regional law firm.

  • Twitter
  • submit to reddit

Comments

  • atif 9 January 2013 20:18 1 0
    If you want to put off speculators then why not prevent developers from selling any off-plan properties unless they are 50% or more completed? Let's hope the CB see sense before too much confidence is destroyed and both the genuine parts of the real estate and banking sector suffer enormously..
  • atif 9 January 2013 20:13 2 0
    When 70pc plus of mkt was made up of speculators, these people were not looking for mortgages to purchase the off-plan property as they never needed to. This rule will harm greatly the vast majority of end-users who do need mortgages, and some 70-80% of such buyers need mortgages witha LTV greater than 50%. In essense, when the recovery is so fragile, to isolate 70-80% of the end user mkt just makes no sense.
  • atif 9 January 2013 20:10 0 1
    This is clearly an extremly poorly thought out and short sighted proposal and higlights the fact that the CB does not even understand what caused the bubble and crash in the first place. The bubble was not caused by excessive mortgage lending but by the fact you could put 10-20% down on an off-plan property and flip the contract for a quick buck and hope you weren't the last one left holding the baby.
  • Luke 9 January 2013 18:18 0 0
    It's all about credit. What makes people think that house prices driven higher by cheap and freely available credit are sustainable? If there was no credit at all, where would prices be? Probably somewhere near their true value. Add leverage via credit and everything gets distorted.
  • nicholas catsanis 9 January 2013 14:29 5 0
    This move is in the right direction as it shows that the deciders are motivated by sound practices and not eager on sales which will abort; filter out solid developers. Next, review the period 2007-2012 and oblige developers to swiftly compensate investors damaged by late handovers, of lesser surface and quality. The gain in reputation from this will compensate the lost investors with inadequate equity and bring solid buyers.
  • dave 9 January 2013 12:56 2 4
    the winners will be people who are already on the property ladder. it will affect any short term gains but next 2-5 years will see a huge return. Lending will ease once the market recovers, probably 2015...then anyone who owns a property now will make a killing.
  • M 9 January 2013 12:02 5 4
    Rent prices will not be increased due to the circular, it is a supply and demand question. Potential buyers are currently renting, so from that point of view, if potential buyers decide not to buy properties they will continue renting without increasing demand for rent as they are already there! It can even be argued that should property prices reduce, rent prices can also reduce (depending again on the supply and demand dynamics of the market)
  • Owais 9 January 2013 11:25 8 1
    The directive will check the prices of the properties and curb speculative behavior to quite an extent.

Have your say

Comments submitted by third parties on this site are the sole responsibility of the individual/s whose content is submitted. DMI accepts no responsibility for the content of comment/s, including, without limitation, any error, omission or inaccuracy therein. Please note that your email address will NOT appear on the site.

By submitting your comments you agree to this website's Terms & Conditions

Type in the characters you see in the picture below.

Videos

Follow
Emirates 24|7

Follow
Emirates 24|7
Google+ Facebook Twitter RSS

Most Popular in News

Latest jobs available

More jobs on Emirates 24|7

In Case You Missed It ...