It is a toxic economic mix America has not seen in three decades: Prices are speeding upward at the fastest pace in a quarter century, even as the economy loses steam.
Economists call the disease “stagflation,” and they are worried it might be coming back.
Already, paychecks are not stretching as far, and jobs are harder to find, threatening to set off a vicious cycle that could make things even worse.
The economy nearly stalled in the final three months of last year and probably is barely growing or even shrinking now. That is the “stagnation” part of the ailment. Typically, that slowdown should slow inflation as well – the second part of the diagnosis – but prices are still marching higher.
The latest worrisome news came on Tuesday: a government report showing wholesale prices climbed 7.4 per cent in the past year. That was the biggest annual leap since 1981.
“We’re in a slowdown,” Press Secretary Dana Perino said at the White House, where the economics talk was still upbeat until recently.
Once the twin evils of stagflation take hold, it can be hard to break the grip. People cut back on their spending as they are stung by rising prices and shriveling wages. Businesses, also socked by rising costs and declining demand from customers, clamp down on their hiring and capital investment.
That would be a nightmare scenario for Wall Street investors, businesses, politicians and almost everyone else. They’re already looking to the Federal Reserve for help, but the Fed’s job is complicated by the situation.
The mission of Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke and his colleagues is to nurture economic growth and keep inflation under control. To brace the teetering economy, the Fed since September has been ratcheting down its key interest rate. Another cut is expected in March. However, to combat inflation, the Fed would be expected to boost rates instead.
“The Fed has its hands full. It is preoccupied with the economic slowdown at the front door, but inflation looks to be sneaking in the back door,” said Greg McBride, senior financial analyst at Bankrate.com. “If that trend continues, the Fed would need to show the economy some tough love, meaning higher interest rates to keep inflation from getting out of hand.”
On the other hand, Brian Bethune, economist at Global Insight, said Bernanke can fight only one war at a time, and the more pressing issue right now is to shore up the ailing economy. “That’s the war that needs to be fought. The war on inflation will have to come another day,” Bethune said.
Maybe things won’t be so bad. Stock prices rose for the day, continuing a recent mini-rally. And Federal Reserve vice chairman Donald Kohn said in a speech that he doesn’t expect the recent elevated inflation readings to persist.
“But the recent information on prices underlines the need to continue to monitor the inflation situation very carefully,” he added.
Some numbers underscore the concerns:
- Prices paid by consumers are up 4.1 per cent over the past year, the biggest increase in 17 years. Those higher prices – especially for heating homes and filling up gas tanks – are taking an ever-bigger bite out of paychecks. Workers’ weekly earnings are down 1.4 per cent from a year ago when adjusted for that inflation.
- Oil prices galloped past $100 a barrel to close at a record $100.88 on Tuesday. Those lofty energy prices are a double-edged sword: They can spread inflation through the economy by boosting the prices of lots of other goods and services, and they can leave people with less money to spend on other things, thus slowing overall economic activity. There are signs high energy prices are causing some damage on both of those fronts.
People are hunkering down. Earlier this month, nervous shoppers handed the nation’s retailers their worst January in almost four decades. High gas and food prices, the toll of the housing bust, the credit crunch and a tougher job market all were to blame. Disappointing sales were widespread, hitting discounters like Wal-Mart Stores Inc. and upscale merchants like Nordstrom Inc.
Wary employers eliminated jobs in January, the first nationwide loss of jobs in more than four years.
With the economy on the edge of a recession – if it hasn’t toppled over already – the Fed for the near term is much more likely to keep lowering rates. Yet, with its own forecast revised last week to show even slower growth this year as well as higher inflation and higher unemployment than previously anticipated, Bernanke and his colleagues have made clear they’ll need to stay nimble.
Can a serious bout of stagflation be avoided? Many economists believe the Fed’s aggressive rate cuts along with tax rebates for people and tax breaks for businesses will lift the economy in the second half of the year.
Until then, analysts warn that it could feel like country is suffering through a mild case of stagflation– even if technically that is not the case. “It could feel like a bad flu,” said Bethune.
In the past stagflation episode in the 1970s and early 1980s, inflation sometimes hit double digits – much higher than the current rate. And unemployment was higher, too. In 1975, for instance, the jobless rate zoomed to 8.5 per cent, which at the time was the highest since the early 1940s. Last year, by contrast, the jobless rate averaged 4.6 per cent.
“In the real economy, activity looks slow but not disastrous,” Alice Rivlin, former vice chair of the Federal Reserve, told Congress Tuesday. But she added: “Uncertainty remains great. ... The risks are mainly on the downside and gloomier forecasts are not hard to find.” (AP)
Worries grow for twin evils of ‘stagflation’