Costa Concordia's 'showboating' was likely cause of disaster

Witnesses said the ship was indulging the local population with a spectacular parade

A risky practice by cruise ships of close-passing the island of Giglio in a foghorn-blasting salute to the local population appears to have contributed to the Costa Concordia disaster, officials and witnesses said on Sunday.

The 114,500 tonne monster cruise liner sank after hitting a reef only 300 metres (985 feet) from shore late Friday as it passed much too close to the shore of the Tuscan island on its route to Savona in northern Italy.

-------------------

‘We were stealing life jackets,’ says cruise ship survivor

------------------

Defence Minister Giampaolo Di Paola, a former Italian navy admiral, blamed "gross human error" for the disaster in comments to Rai3 television on Sunday.

"Ships of such dimensions cannot sail so close to a coastline where one knows there are rocks," the minister said.

Some witnesses said the ship was indulging the local population with a spectacular parade past the island in what is known locally as an "inchino" or reverent bow, with its upper decks ablaze with light as many of the passengers sat down to dinner.

Adding weight to the theory, the daily La Stampa on Sunday published a letter dated last August in which Giglio's mayor Sergio Ortelli thanked the Concordia's captain for the "incredible spectacle" of a previous close pass.

The mayor told journalists on the island on Saturday that the normal route for cruise ships heading north from the port of Civitavecchia near Rome takes them to within three to five kilometres (1.8 to 3.1 miles) of Giglio. "Many of them pass close to Giglio to salute the local population with blasts from their sirens."

"It's a very nice show to see, the ship all lit up when you see it from the land. This time round it went wrong," said the mayor.

On Sunday however, Ortelli denied that it was a regular practice to come so close to the island.

"It's not the practice, or in any way a programmed salute but always in safe conditions," he said.

Ortelli said some skippers of Costa cruise liners liked to "pay tribute" to former colleagues who have retired to the island but that this always occurred in "safe conditions".

Francesco Verusio, the Tuscany region's chief prosecutor, said the ship's captain "should not have been sailing so close to the island" and had him arrested for multiple homicide and abandoning his ship before all the passengers were off.

He said that the captain had "approached Giglio in a very awkward manner", which led the ship to "hit a rock that became embedded in its left side, causing it to list and take in an enormous amount of water in the space of two or three minutes".

Enrico Rossi, the president of the Tuscany region, visited the island on Sunday to see the rescue effort at first hand. He said he would ask the environment ministry on Monday to ensure that cruise ships adhere strictly to navigation rules in future.

"It's shocking to learn that a ship of this size can navigate so close to the coast," Rossi told AFP, adding that it should be possible to balance the need to entertain passengers with the safety of the ship.

 
  • Twitter

Comments

  • Youcef 18 January 2012 08:30 0 0
    There should be technology that prevents human error. I mean, why isnt there satellite navigation/laser equipment that will detect rocks and prevent the ship from getting closer. It will give alarms, sounds, and go on autopilot or something and steer the ship away. This technology already exists in latest cars (sensors etc)
  • Chummy 17 January 2012 01:37 0 0
    Just sit right back and you'll hear a tale...
  • Andrea 16 January 2012 22:21 0 0
    Truly no excuse for taking that kind of risk with so many lives are under the captain's care.
  • Ian 16 January 2012 19:37 0 0
    Will have to think twice now about the Mediteranean cruise I always wanted to take.
  • Joe 16 January 2012 19:33 0 0
    So much for the 'harmonic interference' theory.
  • Ann 16 January 2012 18:08 0 0
    How does this happen! You get those life vests on and get into the water, float on your back, kick your legs and you are on land. The handicapped, this is not a good situation. No more ships for this captain, he's outta here. Needless to say the folks are going to sue. With modern tech on board, it just baffles me how he can navigate into a chunk of whatever. Wow.
  • Charles 16 January 2012 17:31 0 0
    OK - as ignorant as the captain is on the ship, you cannot compare to Titanic. You are only a short distance from shore - if there is no lifeboat available - put on your life-jacket and swim for it. I am sure those in the water from Titanic would have welcomed such an opportunity.
  • Makemyday 16 January 2012 16:23 0 0
    Throw ';El Capitane' in the brig for gross negligence and derelection of his duties - as he should never have left the ship before 'everone' else is safely removed! His actions also resulted in multiple deaths and injuries... Not to forget the lost $$ millions! He was a huge 'coward'!
  • slobo 16 January 2012 08:11 0 0
    "incompetence"? T'wood have been better had the capitan been drunk!
  • Tony 16 January 2012 04:05 0 0
    How do you sink an Italian ship? You put it in water.
  • William Slater 16 January 2012 03:36 0 0
    Don't sail on Friday 13 anymore.
  • Chris 16 January 2012 03:24 0 0
    Yes, I doubt the ship had any business being close to Giglio. The island was not on its port call list and sailing along its coast was risky.
  • Charlie O 16 January 2012 00:39 0 0
    So the truth comes out. Maritime professionals risking lives and a 1/2 billion dollar ship for their own amusement. Let's hope criminal charges of manslaughter and risking a catastrophe are filed, and the pertetrators involved are thrown in the brig where they belong.
  • NadePaulKuciGravMcKi 16 January 2012 00:20 0 0
    Fate!
  • Thom 16 January 2012 00:13 0 0
    In naval aviation this type of activity is referred to as 'flathatting'; and over the years it has gotten quite a few people killed and resulted in the loss of a number of aircraft. Thankfully, most all of the passengers were rescued.

Have your say

Comments submitted by third parties on this site are the sole responsibility of the individual/s whose content is submitted. DMI accepts no responsibility for the content of comment/s, including, without limitation, any error, omission or inaccuracy therein. Please note that your email address will NOT appear on the site.

By submitting your comments you agree to this website's Terms & Conditions

Videos

Follow
Emirates 24|7

Follow
Emirates 24|7
Google+ Facebook Twitter RSS

Most Popular in News

Latest jobs available

More jobs on Emirates 24|7

Editor's Choice

In Case You Missed It ...